$ ai-evals
← all companies

Weights & Biases Weave

LLM tracing, evaluation, and prompt management embedded inside the Weights & Biases ML platform.

score6.8
observabilityLLM evalsprompt managementMLOpsfreemiumwandb.ai/site/weave

Verdict

The right pick if your team already lives in Weights & Biases for ML experiment tracking. Adding a second tool for LLM observability when you have a mature W&B workflow is the wrong move — Weave does enough of the job to consolidate. Outside that audience, it's a less compelling all-in-one than Braintrust or Langfuse.

What it is

Weave is the LLM-focused layer on top of Weights & Biases — the same platform many teams already use for ML experiment tracking, model registry, and dataset versioning. Trace LLM calls with the @weave.op decorator, run evaluations, browse leaderboards, and manage prompts alongside the rest of your ML workflow.

Free tier: limited seats, storage, ingestion. Paid from $60/month.

Where it shines

  • Continuity with W&B. If your ML org has been on W&B for years, Weave is the path of least resistance for adding LLM observability.
  • Decorator instrumentation. @weave.op is a clean API — wrap a function, get a trace.
  • Leaderboards. The eval-comparison UI inherits W&B's strong charting heritage.

Where it falls short

  • Standalone product. Weave alone, without W&B context, isn't the strongest pick in any category.
  • PM collaboration. Versioning and review workflows trail the eval-first specialists.
  • LLM-first orientation. It's still an MLOps platform with LLM features, not the other way around.

Bottom line

The right pick if you're already a W&B shop and your LLM work needs to live in the same neighborhood as your ML pipelines. Outside that audience, the LLM specialists (Braintrust, Langfuse) deliver more value per dollar.

Related